Introduction (Keep your opening, add this after the first image):

When I started on my photo knowledge journey, I went by all the usual things associated with doing a self-taught skillset.

Back in the dark ages, it was common to buy actual books on a subject of photography as YouTube was still sort of in its infancy. You could find information on the web but it was still really limited. Today we are literally bombarded with a constant stream of information that is dizzying.

Photographer David Saylors holding Nikon D7000 camera on city street with red brick wall background — The author on the streets of Chattanooga taking photos with his Nikon D7000 camera.

Starting My Photography Journey with the Nikon D7000

I chose my camera based on information from one of the OGs of the photography space on the web… Ken Rockwell. Now hear me out before you throw your computer across the room.

It is no secret that Ken has a love affair with Nikon and it shows through on his site. So many well worded reviews to choose from made starting my journey with photography a Nikon based one. It is cemented so well that I have never even tried to shoot Canon on my own volition. Nikon should be giving Ken royalties to be honest about it. His reviews are fair (from what I can tell) and well worded and very technical. He has other brands on his site these days too, but back in the day, it was a wealth of Nikon information. For more of my photography philosophy and techniques, browse through my photography blog archive.

When I did jump in, it was with a D7000 DSLR. This was the most technologically advanced of the DX format models at the time. The camera included things such as the focus motor for the older screw drive focus lenses as well as sporting several other features not available on the lesser models of the period. I loved that camera and shot on it for several years while learning the rudiments of the craft.

Looking back, the Nikon D7000 was an excellent choice for a beginner. The DX sensor gave me reach for wildlife and sports, the built-in focus motor meant I could use affordable older lenses, and the 16-megapixel sensor was more than enough for learning composition and exposure. If you're considering a used D7000 today, it's still a capable camera for learning photography fundamentals.

Learning the Rules (And Eventually Breaking Them)

During this period I learned all the cliche things about shooting "better" photos and some of those old rules still linger today in my composition techniques. Fortunately I have since learned that some things are not actually set in stone and you can bend and even break the rules if done right and the images will be great anyway.

Collection of vintage manual focus camera lenses including Nikon and other brands arranged on dark surface — My vintage lens collection - living proof that GAS recovery is an ongoing journey!

Back then I took the idea of mounting one lens and using it for a period of time. Sometimes these periods of time could be quite long. I remember mounting the 35mm f1.8 and leaving it on the camera for months at one point. This is probably why I have gravitated back to that field of view today. Once you use a certain focal length a while, you will get comfortable with what that lens can do for you and you know what to expect. It is like asking an old friend for advice… you just know it is going to be good.

This "one lens" approach taught me more about photography than any gear upgrade ever could. By limiting my options, I learned to see in 35mm. I learned to move my feet instead of twisting a zoom ring. I started anticipating shots instead of reacting to them. This was my first step toward minimalism, though I didn't realize it at the time.

Black and white urban street photography scene with strong architectural contrast and shadow play — Early street photography from my Nikon D7000 learning phase - exploring light and composition

[Image placement here]

The Gear Acquisition Syndrome Phase

At some point I bought a big fast aperture zoom (the 70-200mm if memory serves me) and thought I was in hog heaven. Well, if you dont need a big expensive zoom lens, then why did you buy one? G.A.S. Is the usual culprit here and I am guilty of having this disorder of photography. I am recovering at this point though and at some point I simply stopped buying the latest camera because it was better than the last one or what ever. I still to this day cant seem to stop buying vintage lenses though so I am a work in progress… lol.

Every photographer goes through the GAS phase. We convince ourselves that the next lens, the next camera body, or the next upgrade will unlock our creative potential. The truth? It rarely does. That 70-200mm f/2.8 was an incredible lens, but I found myself leaving it at home more often than not because of the weight and bulk.

I have since figured out that with my photography, I dont need zoom lenses very often at all. I have figured out that I can have more fun with a nice prime lens and not worry too much about missing some special photo or some such. I have learned to just let some photos go and be more in the moment instead. You dont always have to get every single photo possible.

Prime Lenses vs Zoom Lenses: What I Learned

Prime lenses changed everything for me. Here's what I discovered:

Lighter kit = more shooting: A 35mm prime weighs a fraction of a 70-200mm zoom
Better low-light performance: Fast primes (f/1.8, f/1.4) let me shoot in conditions where zooms struggled
Creative limitations = creative growth: Fixed focal lengths forced me to think differently
Better image quality: Even affordable primes often outperform expensive zooms

The 35mm focal length became my signature. On DX format (Nikon D7000), this gave me roughly a 52mm equivalent field of view—perfect for street photography, environmental portraits, and everyday shooting. If you're looking for more on my current gear choices, check out my gear page.

Living Through the Viewfinder vs Living in the Moment

I went through this phase too. Living life through the camera viewfinder… this isn't really living but rather documenting and is not the same thing. This is why I now travel with a very light camera kit if I am going on a trip to do something other than photography for the primary focus of the trip. I feel it is more important to live in the moment than to worry incessantly on getting the best angle or exposure or whatever.

This realization was profound. I was so focused on capturing every moment that I wasn't actually experiencing the moments I was capturing. Family vacations became photo assignments. Dinners with friends became lighting challenges. I was missing the point entirely.

It is this last part that has taught me that I have evolved as a photographer. I no longer need to photograph everything possible and spend countless hours editing in lightroom to be happy. To be completely transparent about it, I only edit a very select few images in Lightroom these days just to get the "one" I want. I still shoot in raw plus jpeg to give me that choice but I rarely use the raw files.

My current approach: I shoot RAW+JPEG but use the JPEGs 95% of the time. The camera's built-in processing is usually good enough, and accepting that has freed me from spending hours at the computer. When I do edit, it's intentional—one or two photos from a day that really speak to me.

You can see this philosophy in action in my post about solo street photography with the Leica CL, where I discuss finding joy in the process rather than the pursuit of perfection.

My Photography Evolution: From Technical to Intentional

Looking back at your photography journey, have you progressed in a positive way?

For me, the answer is absolutely yes—but not in the way I expected. I haven't progressed by acquiring better gear or mastering more advanced techniques. I've progressed by:

Simplifying my kit - From a bag full of zooms to a single prime lens
Reducing post-processing - From hours in Lightroom to accepting JPEGs
Being more selective - From shooting hundreds of frames to choosing moments intentionally
Enjoying the process - From chasing the perfect shot to experiencing life with a camera in hand

My journey from the Nikon D7000 to my current Leica setup isn't about having better equipment—it's about understanding what I actually need and what brings me joy. The D7000 taught me the fundamentals. The prime lenses taught me to see. The GAS phase taught me what I don't need. And minimalism taught me what photography is really about.

You can see this philosophy in action in my post about solo street photography with the Leica CL , where I discuss finding joy in the process rather than the pursuit of perfection.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Nikon D7000 still good in 2024?

Yes, the Nikon D7000 is still an excellent camera for learning photography. While it lacks modern features like 4K video or advanced autofocus, its 16-megapixel sensor, built-in focus motor, and solid build quality make it perfect for beginners. You can find used D7000 bodies for under $300, making it an incredible value for learning the craft.

Should beginner photographers use prime lenses or zoom lenses?

I recommend starting with a prime lens, specifically a 35mm or 50mm. While zoom lenses offer versatility, prime lenses force you to move, think about composition, and really learn to see. They're also typically sharper, faster (better in low light), and more affordable than equivalent zoom lenses. Once you master a prime, you'll know if you actually need a zoom.

How do you overcome Gear Acquisition Syndrome (GAS)?

The best cure for GAS is to pick one camera and one lens and commit to using only that setup for 3-6 months. You'll quickly learn what you actually need versus what you think you need. I also recommend asking yourself: "Will this new gear let me take photos I literally cannot take with my current setup?" If the answer is no, don't buy it.

What focal length is best for street photography?

I prefer 35mm (on full frame) or 23mm on APS-C, which gives you a similar field of view. This focal length is wide enough to capture context but not so wide that it distorts subjects. The 50mm equivalent focal length is also popular and works beautifully—it's really about personal preference. Try both if you can. See examples in my street photography portfolio</a> to see how I use these focal lengths in practice.

Do you need to shoot RAW or is JPEG okay?

For most photography, especially if you're still learning, JPEG is perfectly fine. Modern cameras have excellent JPEG processing. I shoot RAW+JPEG and use the JPEGs 95% of the time. Only shoot RAW if you know you'll be doing significant post-processing or if you're shooting in challenging lighting conditions where you'll need maximum flexibility.